Here are some hints on how to interpret the
SpecXpert test results: Standard placement behaviour: End components (like end caps or blind flanges) are placed at the
end of a branch All in-line parts are placed where the end preparations of the
part are compatible with the pipe or mating flanges. Parts with non-compatible end preparations are placed at the end
of a branch. For all placed parts, to-do-list entries are created by
Smart 3D whenever something goes wrong during
placement. SpecXpert does not create the to-do-list
entries. It only summarizes them in the provided reports. The same to-do-list entries would be created if the part was
placed manually under the same conditions. Under different conditions it might be possible to place the part
without an error. Depending on the conditions the part may be OK. There are many reasons for to-do-list-entries being created within
Smart 3D, and SpecXpert does not provide analysis for the possible
causes. It only lists all parts that caused problems. An expert in
writing pipe specs needs to check these parts under the placement
conditions the part was intended for. In many cases the complete spec
has to be considered and reviewed to identify and rectify the
problem. Some common reasons for to-do-list entries are: Non-compatible end preparations Missing or broken symbol DLL Missing generic data Missing mating flange (selection basis = 5)
Troubleshooting
In the
current iteration of SpecXpert, only existing catalogue parts are
tested. SpecXpert does NOT provide detailed information about what went
wrong during placement, just that placement was not successful. To find
the exact reason for why an error occurred, the complete spec would be
needed for analysis.
If custom
naming rules are installed on the plant, SpecXpert might face some
problems during placement, if the naming rules either slow down the
placement of components or the resulting name cannot created by the rule
due to e.g. missing system names. Ideally the SpecXpert placement test
is run after problems with the spec that could be detected with the
Intergraph Verify Consistency Check were already fixed.To-do-list
entries for automatically placed parts
Reasons for to-do-list
entries
It should
be noted that analysis and rectification of problems with the pipe specs
is not covered with SpecXpert and nor is this service
covered under the maintenance agreement for the product. CAXperts can
offer an analysis service for any problematic parts, but this would be
charged for separately. If there is a desire to use this service, please
contact CAXperts to request a pricing proposal.